Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Virginia DUI Lawyers Loudoun Under Influence

Virginia DUI Lawyers Loudoun

Below is a sample case of traffic violation in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with a traffic ticket in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged for a traffic violation in Virginia?

We have defended many traffic tickets in Virginia and we can help you as well.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic violation.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Truman v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant a resident of Loudoun contended that the trial court erred in failing to dismiss his manslaughter indictment because that conviction violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of U.S. Const. amend. V, and Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-294. The appellate court disagreed, finding that the driving under influence (DUI) statute, under which defendant had been previously convicted, and the vehicular aggravated involuntary manslaughter statute required proof of different elements. While the manslaughter statute required proof of driving under the influence, it also required criminal negligence and death

            If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • To determine whether two charges constitute the same offense, a court must consider the rule enunciated in Blockburger. Where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not. A double jeopardy violation exists only if the offenses always require proof of the same elements. In applying the Blockburger test, the court looks at the offenses charged in the abstract, without referring to the particular facts of the case under review.
  • A defendant's level of intoxication is relevant to a determination of the degree of the defendant's negligence: whether ordinary, gross, or wanton. It may serve to elevate the defendant's conduct to the level of negligence so gross, wanton, and culpable as to show a reckless disregard of human life.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your traffic ticket.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Our Phone #

Loudoun Virginia

Loudoun 703-278-0405
Click here to call us toll free Sris Lawyer Click here to call us toll free

Social Icons

Powered by Blogger.